From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2012 22:49:30 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] backlight: lcd: add driver for raster-type lcd's with gpio controlled panel reset In-Reply-To: <4F05F509.6020405@metafoo.de> References: <1325778146-27056-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <4F05F509.6020405@metafoo.de> Message-ID: <20120106064929.GB3496@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:07:53PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > > +- lcd,pwrctrl-min-uV: If a regulator controls the Vcc voltage of the lcd panel, > > + this property specifies the minimum voltage the regulator should supply. > > + The value of this property should in in micro-volts. > > +- lcd,pwrctrl-max-uV: If a regulator controls the Vcc voltage of the lcd panel, > > + this property specifies the maximum voltage the regulator should limit to > > + on the Vcc line. The value of this property should in in micro-volts. > The min and max voltage should rather be specified through the regulator > constraints. In principle it should be specified in both places to account for shared supplies though for all practical purposes for an LCD panel I can't see multiple users sharing the same regulator and varying the voltage at runtime. > > + if (lcd_enable) { > > + if ((pd->min_uV || pd->max_uV) && > > + regulator_set_voltage(lp->regulator, > > + pd->min_uV, pd->max_uV)) > > + dev_info(lp->dev, > > + "regulator voltage set failed\n"); > > + if (regulator_enable(lp->regulator)) > > + dev_info(lp->dev, "failed to enable regulator\n"); > > + } else { > > + regulator_disable(lp->regulator); > > + } > I think you have to make sure that the regulator enable and disable calls are > balanced. Yes. > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > I think you can remove all the CONFIG_OF ifdefs, the of API should stub itself out. It's reasonably idiomatic to do this if the parsing code is in a separate function.