From: sameo@linux.intel.com (Samuel Ortiz)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 03/12] mfd: twl-core: Add initial DT support for twl4030/twl6030
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 00:38:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120108233820.GH13679@sortiz-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F030C2D.3000808@ti.com>
Hi Benoit,
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 03:09:49PM +0100, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 1/2/2012 10:04 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 03:56:37PM +0100, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> >> Add initial device-tree support for twl familly chips.
> >> The current version is missing the regulator entries due
> >> to the lack of DT regulator bindings for the moment.
> >> Only the simple sub-modules that do not depend on
> >> platform_data information can be initialized properly.
> >>
> >> Add irqdomain support.
> >>
> >> Add documentation for the Texas Instruments TWL Integrated Chip.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
> >> Cc: Balaji T K<balajitk@ti.com>
> >> Cc: Graeme Gregory<gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
> >> Cc: Samuel Ortiz<sameo@linux.intel.com>
> >> ---
> >> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> >> index f1391c2..f0de088 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> >> +++ b/drivers/mfd/Kconfig
> >> @@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ config MENELAUS
> >> config TWL4030_CORE
> >> bool "Texas Instruments TWL4030/TWL5030/TWL6030/TPS659x0 Support"
> >> depends on I2C=y&& GENERIC_HARDIRQS
> >> + select IRQ_DOMAIN
> >
> > As discussed on linux-next, this breaks powerpc. Drivers cannot select
> > IRQ_DOMAIN, it can only be selected by architectures. Drivers must depend
> > on it instead.
>
> OK, good to know. The previous version was already breaking non-ARM platform because the IRQ_DOMAIN was not defined, hence this update.
> I was able to check that this patch was fixing at least x86... but did not have any way to check the PPC build.
>
> To be honest, I did not fully understand that this flag was there because some arch does not support IRQ domain yet and thus it should be selected at arch level.
>
> Samuel,
> Here is the updated version, and hopefully the last one, including Grant's fix.
>
Thanks, I applied it now.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-08 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-22 14:56 [PATCH v4 00/12] OMAP4: Add DT support for i2c and twl6030 Benoit Cousson
2011-12-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] ARM: OMAP2+: pm: Do not init statically the SR and voltage layer with DT Benoit Cousson
2011-12-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] i2c: OMAP: Add DT support for i2c controller Benoit Cousson
2011-12-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] mfd: twl-core: Add initial DT support for twl4030/twl6030 Benoit Cousson
2011-12-22 17:31 ` Samuel Ortiz
2012-01-02 9:04 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-03 14:09 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-01-08 23:38 ` Samuel Ortiz [this message]
2011-12-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] rtc: rtc-twl: Add DT support for RTC inside twl4030/twl6030 Benoit Cousson
2011-12-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] arm/dts: OMAP4: Add i2c controller nodes Benoit Cousson
2011-12-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] arm/dts: OMAP3: " Benoit Cousson
2011-12-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] arm/dts: twl6030: Add DTS file for twl6030 PMIC Benoit Cousson
2011-12-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] arm/dts: twl4030: Add DTS file for twl4030 PM + Audio IC Benoit Cousson
2011-12-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] arm/dts: omap4-panda: Add twl6030 and i2c EEPROM Benoit Cousson
2011-12-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] arm/dts: omap4-sdp: Add twl6030, i2c3 and i2c4 devices Benoit Cousson
2011-12-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] arm/dts: omap3-beagle: Add twl4030 and i2c EEPROM Benoit Cousson
2011-12-22 14:56 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] ARM: OMAP2+: board-generic: Remove i2c static init Benoit Cousson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120108233820.GH13679@sortiz-mobl \
--to=sameo@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox