From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:26:24 +0000
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
 definition
In-Reply-To: <1327310131.2446.1.camel@twins>
References: <1327081352-13178-1-git-send-email-catalin.marinas@arm.com>
 <1327310131.2446.1.camel@twins>
Message-ID: <20120123092624.GA11983@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:15:31AM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 17:42 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > This is version 3 of the set of patches removing
> > __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ARM. The series was rebased on top of
> > 3.3-rc1 and fixed the conflicts with the kernel/sched/ changes and the
> > ARM LPAE patches. There are no functional changes from v2. I plan to
> > push this to -next and get it ready for 3.4-rc1.
> > 
> > Question for Peter/Ingo - how do we merge the first patch that
> > introduces finish_arch_post_lock_switch? Do you pick it up or I can
> > merge it via rmk (with your ack)?
> 
> I'm fine either way, I'll probably ask Ingo to pull your tree so that I
> can stack some other patches on top.

In which case I would need Russell's acked-by.

Thanks.

-- 
Catalin