From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW definition
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 09:47:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120123094759.GU1068@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120123092624.GA11983@arm.com>
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:26:24AM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 09:15:31AM +0000, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 17:42 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > This is version 3 of the set of patches removing
> > > __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ARM. The series was rebased on top of
> > > 3.3-rc1 and fixed the conflicts with the kernel/sched/ changes and the
> > > ARM LPAE patches. There are no functional changes from v2. I plan to
> > > push this to -next and get it ready for 3.4-rc1.
> > >
> > > Question for Peter/Ingo - how do we merge the first patch that
> > > introduces finish_arch_post_lock_switch? Do you pick it up or I can
> > > merge it via rmk (with your ack)?
> >
> > I'm fine either way, I'll probably ask Ingo to pull your tree so that I
> > can stack some other patches on top.
>
> In which case I would need Russell's acked-by.
That depends on knowing what CPU architectures this has been tested on,
and whether anyone external has tested it. It's definitely a change
which needs some tested-by tags on it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-23 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 17:42 [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW definition Catalin Marinas
2012-01-20 17:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] sched: Introduce the finish_arch_post_lock_switch() scheduler hook Catalin Marinas
2012-02-27 14:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-20 17:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] ARM: Use TTBR1 instead of reserved context ID Catalin Marinas
2012-01-20 17:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] ARM: Allow ASID 0 to be allocated to tasks Catalin Marinas
2012-01-20 17:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ASID-capable CPUs Catalin Marinas
2012-01-20 17:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ARM: Remove current_mm per-cpu variable Catalin Marinas
2012-01-20 17:42 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] ARM: Remove __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on pre-ARMv6 CPUs Catalin Marinas
2012-01-23 9:15 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW definition Peter Zijlstra
2012-01-23 9:26 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-01-23 9:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-01-23 9:53 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-01-24 15:14 ` Will Deacon
2012-01-25 10:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2012-02-16 13:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120123094759.GU1068@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).