From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 22:09:24 +0100 Subject: LPC32xx status (Re: [PATCH] Correct bad gpio naming) In-Reply-To: <4F1F16A8.7010407@antcom.de> References: <4F1C4E25.6070801@antcom.de> <20120124155921.GH2609@pengutronix.de> <4F1EDD15.7010704@antcom.de> <20120124192545.GB8502@pengutronix.de> <4F1F16A8.7010407@antcom.de> Message-ID: <20120124210924.GD8502@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > Unfortunately, I currently don't have a phy3250, but can check > tomorrow with colleagues. Shouldn't matter that much, or? Once the core support is back and works for your board, others could test with their boards. > I guess the work92105_defconfig is only useful once the drivers > currently missing in mainline are merged. Or is there an arm specific > tree I should update from? You can keep the work92105_defconfig in your tree, but we'd need to introduce a lpc32xx_defconfig. That should start with a minimal (but working) config and can be extended once the drivers are in place. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: