From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 14:53:33 +0000 Subject: Common clock API for i.MX In-Reply-To: References: <20120125084533.GD1068@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <20120125145333.GO3687@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 07:45:15AM -0600, Matt Sealey wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux > > My conclusion, therefore, is that there's very little actual interest > > amongst the ARM community to move towards a common clk API. > Maybe it's a chicken-egg thing; nobody wants to work on it until someone else > has done some legwork? :) I do think that this is a big part of the issue, the patches have been floating around for ages and it's not clear when they'll manage to make it in (and hence when it'll be worth moving to use them). > > As a result of the lack of motivation by others over this, I've lost > > interest in it. ?Sorry. > Can I drum up some interest here? Guys, what's going on? Who was > ultimately responsible for the code/concept? Mike Turquette has been driving this for the past while. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: