From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:52:02 +0000 Subject: Common clock API for i.MX In-Reply-To: References: <20120125084533.GD1068@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120125145333.GO3687@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <20120125155202.GQ3687@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:42:20AM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012, Mark Brown wrote: > > I do think that this is a big part of the issue, the patches have been > > floating around for ages and it's not clear when they'll manage to make > > it in (and hence when it'll be worth moving to use them). > Maybe because nobody is actively promoting them and pushing them > forward? It is not sufficient to just post patches to a mailing list > and wait. Yeah, it's a chicken and egg situation - it seems very difficult for them to get integrated so few people are spending much time on them which means it's not obvious that there's a pressing need for them :( -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: