From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: gregkh@suse.de (Greg KH) Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:21:55 -0800 Subject: patch "tty: serial: OMAP: ensure FIFO levels are set correctly in non-DMA" added to tty tree In-Reply-To: References: <13274430881471@kroah.org> Message-ID: <20120126042155.GA3185@suse.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 08:02:09PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote: > cc lists > > Hi Greg > > On Tue, 24 Jan 2012, gregkh at suse.de wrote: > > > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > tty: serial: OMAP: ensure FIFO levels are set correctly in non-DMA > > > > to my tty git tree which can be found at > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/tty.git > > in the tty-linus branch. > > If it's not too late, I was wondering if you could drop this patch and the > subsequent one ("tty: serial: OMAP: transmit FIFO threshold interrupts > don't wake the"), in favor of the second version of this series that was > just posted at > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=132754676814391&w=2 > > If it is too late, we'll deal with it in 3.4. What is wrong with the patches that I applied? How about a fix-up patch on top of what I have applied instead of whole new ones? greg k-h