From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sameo@linux.intel.com (Samuel Ortiz)
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:30:16 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 00/33] Restore SA11x0 MCP/UCB drivers to a working state
In-Reply-To: <20120125211427.GI1068@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <20120125143000.GF1068@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <20120125145420.GC2054@sirena.org.uk>
 <20120125211427.GI1068@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20120126203016.GB2305@sortiz-mobl>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 09:14:27PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:54:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 02:30:00PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 06:04:56PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > 
> > > > The following patch set restores the SA11x0 MCP and UCB1x00 drivers back
> > > > to a working state, as tested on the Assabet.
> > 
> > > I've not heard anything back from anyone, so I'm going to assume that's
> > > silent approval.
> > 
> > FWIW Samuel tends to review patches every few weeks to every month, it's
> > not unusual for several weeks to patch before things get looked at.
> 
> That's not going to be much use - by that time we'll be at -rc4 or so,
> which means that reverting the rather large changes becomes much more
> of an eye-brow raising request than it would do at -rc1 time.  We're
> already at the theoretical dawn of -rc2, one week after -rc1.
> 
> So, I think the only thing I can do is push the fixes upstream myself
> and hope that Samuel doesn't have an issue with it 
No, I'm fine with it. I currently won't have time to build a proper pull
request for this one, so please go ahead and push it to Linus.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/