From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 14:41:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mtd/gpmi : add BBT support In-Reply-To: <201201301430.44374.marek.vasut@gmail.com> References: <1327898174-13656-1-git-send-email-b32955@freescale.com> <201201301327.41298.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <20120130131205.GD15596@pengutronix.de> <201201301430.44374.marek.vasut@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20120130134130.GG15596@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > Hehe, just torturing you guys a bit :) And the gain of that is? The only outcome I currently see is that I feel less motivated to put you on CC next time. > > > > Did it always do that? Or is a newer version needed? > > > > > > I can't comment on this one, I never used it. I rather got NAND working > > > properly. > > > > Me neither. But if so, we have another regression candidate. > > What regression candidate ? The version of NAND driver in u-boot should be close > to what's in mainline Linux kernel. I am not talking about U-Boot here. I was wondering if somebody who uses the FSL deployment method would need to update kobs-ng, so a proper BBT gets written. If so, people missing the need to update would see a regression. Which is another reason to not make BBT usage default. But I maybe wrong here. Huang will tell. -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: