From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 13:26:18 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v2 6/9] ARM: mx31ads: add audmux device In-Reply-To: <20120202131716.GF9773@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1328148728-32258-1-git-send-email-richard.zhao@linaro.org> <1328148728-32258-7-git-send-email-richard.zhao@linaro.org> <20120202120900.GC7428@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120202131716.GF9773@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: <20120202132618.GL7428@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 09:17:18PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 12:09:01PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > Since the audmux is a part of the SoC silicon shouldn't the SoC just > > register the device without individual boards having to do anything > > (possibly conditional on ASoC being selected in Kconfig or something)? > > It's going to be connected in exactly the same fashion on any system > > using the SoC. > Hmm, we are trying to save adding the device for those boards which do > not route any audmux pins out at all. That's why I'm saying perhaps make it conditional on having ASoC built (or even on having the AUDMUX driver built). -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: