From: grant.likely@secretlab.ca (Grant Likely)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 00/25] irq_domain generalization and refinement
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 22:56:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120206055609.GA21449@ponder.secretlab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120204221748.GN14129@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Sat, Feb 04, 2012 at 10:17:48PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 02:35:54PM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > This patch series is ready for much wider consumption now. I'd like
> > to get it into linux-next ASAP because there will be ARM board support
> > depending on it. I'll wait a few days before I ask Stephen to pull
> > this in.
>
> Grant,
>
> Can you answer me this: does this irqdomain support require DT?
No, it should not. Any situation where it does is a bug.
> Now, here's the thing: I believe that IRQ domains - at least as far as
> the hwirq stuff - should be available irrespective of whether we have
> the rest of the IRQ domain support code in place, so that IRQ support
> code doesn't have to keep playing games to decode from the global
> space to the per-controller number space.
Correct. That's the intent. My new series flushes out irq_domain quite a
bit better and gets all architectures doing the same thing if they use
irq_domains. I've done some testing on both CONFIG_OF and !CONFIG_OF builds,
but I'm going to do some more to make sure I've not missed anything.
> I believe that would certainly help the current OMAP problems, where
> the current lack of CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN basically makes the kernel oops
> on boot.
>
> How we fix this regression for 3.4 I've no idea at present, I'm trying
> to work out what the real dependencies are for OMAP on this stuff.
>
> Finally, do we need asm/irq.h in our asm/prom.h ? That's causing
> fragility between DT and non-DT builds, because people are finding
> that their DT builds work without their mach/irqs.h includes but
> fail when built with non-DT. The only thing which DT might need -
> at the most - is NR_IRQS, but I'd hope with things like irq domains
> it doesn't actually require it.
I don't think so. There may be a file or two that break because they're
not including everything they need, but I don't think anything in the
header requires it.
The irq_domain code is well isolated. The header file doesn't need to
be including it.
g.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 5:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-27 21:35 [PATCH v3 00/25] irq_domain generalization and refinement Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:35 ` [PATCH v3 01/25] irq_domain: add documentation and MAINTAINERS entry Grant Likely
2012-01-28 18:23 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-01-27 21:35 ` [PATCH v3 02/25] dt: Make irqdomain less verbose Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:35 ` [PATCH v3 03/25] irq_domain: Make irq_domain structure match powerpc's irq_host Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:35 ` [PATCH v3 04/25] irq_domain: convert microblaze from irq_host to irq_domain Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:35 ` [PATCH v3 05/25] irq_domain/powerpc: Use common irq_domain structure instead of irq_host Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 06/25] irq_domain/powerpc: eliminate irq_map; use irq_alloc_desc() instead Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 07/25] irq_domain/powerpc: Eliminate virq_is_host() Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 08/25] irq_domain: Move irq_domain code from powerpc to kernel/irq Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 09/25] irqdomain: remove NO_IRQ from irq domain code Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 10/25] irq_domain: Remove references to old irq_host names Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 11/25] irq_domain: Replace irq_alloc_host() with revmap-specific initializers Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 12/25] irq_domain: Add support for base irq and hwirq in legacy mappings Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 13/25] irq_domain: Remove 'new' irq_domain in favour of the ppc one Grant Likely
2012-02-03 14:48 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-02-03 16:42 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 14/25] irq_domain: Remove irq_domain_add_simple() Grant Likely
2012-01-31 12:45 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-31 13:15 ` Rob Herring
2012-01-31 13:58 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-01 0:08 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-01 5:46 ` [PATCH] irq_domain: fix the irq number of imx5 tzic Shawn Guo
2012-02-02 4:58 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 15/25] irq_domain: Create common xlate functions that device drivers can use Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 16/25] irq_domain: constify irq_domain_ops Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 17/25] irq_domain/c6x: Convert c6x to use generic irq_domain support Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 18/25] irq_domain/c6x: constify irq_domain structures Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 19/25] irq_domain/c6x: Use library of xlate functions Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 20/25] irq_domain/powerpc: constify irq_domain_ops Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 21/25] irqdomain/powerpc: Replace custom xlate functions with library functions Grant Likely
2012-02-06 5:22 ` Michael Neuling
2012-02-06 6:00 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 22/25] irq_domain/x86: Convert x86 (embedded) to use common irq_domain Grant Likely
2012-01-28 16:44 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-01-29 0:35 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-29 0:39 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-30 19:58 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-01 14:17 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-02-01 18:06 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-23 19:56 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-23 21:22 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2012-02-23 21:39 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 23/25] irq_domain: Include hwirq number in /proc/interrupts Grant Likely
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 24/25] irq_domain: remove "hint" when allocating irq numbers Grant Likely
2012-02-07 18:07 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-02-15 15:04 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-02-15 20:21 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-15 21:50 ` Shawn Guo
2012-02-16 5:32 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-16 6:03 ` Shawn Guo
2012-01-27 21:36 ` [PATCH v3 25/25] irq_domain: mostly eliminate slow-path revmap lookups Grant Likely
2012-02-15 16:36 ` Nicolas Ferre
2012-02-15 20:29 ` Grant Likely
2012-01-28 18:38 ` [PATCH v3 00/25] irq_domain generalization and refinement Rob Herring
2012-01-31 4:53 ` Olof Johansson
2012-02-01 0:07 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-04 22:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-04 22:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-05 1:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-02-05 16:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-07 15:26 ` Mark Brown
2012-02-15 20:33 ` Grant Likely
2012-02-05 0:01 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2012-02-06 0:51 ` Rob Herring
2012-02-06 5:56 ` Grant Likely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120206055609.GA21449@ponder.secretlab.ca \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).