From: jrnieder@gmail.com (Jonathan Nieder)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [regression] Re: Enabling runtime P2V by default
Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:31:47 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120206223147.GA3760@burratino> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110810092206.GE10121@e102144-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:16:35AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 09, 2011 at 09:41:38PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>> From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
>>>
>>> This works like a charm so I'll just default-select it.
>>
>> Well, we can remove the EXPERIMENTAL status of this option now. This
>> raises the question is whether we should now default it to 'y' - I
>> think we should. Anyone have any objections?
>
> I've been running with this option enabled for the collection of ARM boards
> I have and the only problem I have encountered was related to u-boot loading
> at the wrong address.
Hm, another u-boot problem was found[1]. On the affected machines it
prevents booting a compressed kernel (but uncompressed kernels are
fine) unless CONFIG_ARM_PATCH_PHYS_VIRT is disabled or u-boot is
patched.
> So I'm all for enabling it by default, especially since it will force out
> any remaining issues for boards where this hasn't been used extensively.
Looks like it worked. ;-)
So, what now? Is there anything the kernel can do to work around
this, or should we just live with the regression until people patch
their u-boot?
Thanks,
Jonathan
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.boot-loaders.u-boot/124051/focus=124062
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42680
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-06 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-09 19:41 [PATCH 3/5] mach-u300: patch physoffset by default Linus Walleij
2011-08-10 9:16 ` Enabling runtime P2V by default (Re: [PATCH 3/5] mach-u300: patch physoffset by default) Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-10 9:22 ` Will Deacon
2011-08-10 9:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-11 8:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-11 8:32 ` Baruch Siach
2011-08-11 8:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-08-11 8:46 ` Will Deacon
2011-08-11 17:52 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2011-08-15 23:20 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-02-06 22:31 ` Jonathan Nieder [this message]
2012-02-06 23:16 ` [regression] Re: Enabling runtime P2V by default Nicolas Pitre
2012-02-06 23:23 ` Jonathan Nieder
2012-02-09 6:34 ` Ian Campbell
2011-08-10 9:40 ` Enabling runtime P2V by default (Re: [PATCH 3/5] mach-u300: patch physoffset by default) Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120206223147.GA3760@burratino \
--to=jrnieder@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).