From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mporter@ti.com (Matt Porter) Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:17:05 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc-smsc911x: add required smsc911x regulators In-Reply-To: <20120213165617.GE3494@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1329151422-2146-1-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com> <20120213165209.GA31482@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120213165617.GE3494@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <20120213181704.GE40045@h115-84.vpn.ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:56:18AM -0800, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:52:09PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > > I think OMAP (or even the reg-fixed-voltage folk) needs to create an enum > > similar to what I did for 8250 to control the allocation of platform > > device IDs for this, otherwise we're going to keep on running over this > > problem. > > > Added Mark for his comment. > > Hrm, seems slightly icky but the enum will work if we can decide how to > add elements to the enum since it'll be easy to bloat a lot it if it's > central. It's tempting to suggest just using a random number to assign > the IDs randomly rather than have a central registry but obviously > there's no guarantees there. Another option might be to provide a generic platform device helper that instantiates a per-named-platform-device id list that simply provides the next available id sequentially as requests for platform device registration arrive. arch init: platform_create_id_list_create("reg-fixed-voltage"); platform init: /* I = 0..N, .id filled in by _autoid() registration */ static struct platform_device my_fixed_regulatorN = { .name = "reg-fixed-voltage", .dev = ... } platform_device_register_autoid(&my_fixed_regulator0); platform_device_register_autoid(&my_fixed_regulator1); platform_device_register_autoid(&my_fixed_regulator2); ... platform_device_register_autoid(&my_fixed_regulatorN); Something like this might be able to solve this once for the platform device users don't need a fixed enum id. It would require changes to platform_device_register() to update the list as static assignment of ids occurs so those will not be used by the _autoid() method. -Matt