linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [BUG] LPAE can be enabled with non-LPAE capable CPUs
@ 2012-02-14  8:21 Russell King - ARM Linux
  2012-02-14 12:15 ` Catalin Marinas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2012-02-14  8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Catalin,

The latest OMAP randconfig kautobuildv2 build has found the following issue:

arch/arm/mm/proc-v6.S:124: Error: unrecognized relocation suffix
arch/arm/mm/proc-v6.S:124: Error: unrecognized relocation suffix
arch/arm/mm/proc-v6.S:124: Error: unrecognized relocation suffix
arch/arm/mm/proc-v6.S:124: Error: unrecognized relocation suffix

The config file indicates:

CONFIG_CPU_V6=y
CONFIG_CPU_V7=y
CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y

As V6 CPUs don't support LPAE, this is an invalid configuration, which
suggests that the constraints within Kconfig are insufficient for LPAE.
Should ARM_LPAE depend on CPU_V7 && !CPU_32v6 && !CPU_32v5 && !CPU_32v4T
&& !CPU_32v4 && !CPU_32v3 ?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [BUG] LPAE can be enabled with non-LPAE capable CPUs
  2012-02-14  8:21 [BUG] LPAE can be enabled with non-LPAE capable CPUs Russell King - ARM Linux
@ 2012-02-14 12:15 ` Catalin Marinas
  2012-02-14 12:20   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2012-02-14 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 08:21:29AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> The latest OMAP randconfig kautobuildv2 build has found the following issue:
> 
> arch/arm/mm/proc-v6.S:124: Error: unrecognized relocation suffix
> arch/arm/mm/proc-v6.S:124: Error: unrecognized relocation suffix
> arch/arm/mm/proc-v6.S:124: Error: unrecognized relocation suffix
> arch/arm/mm/proc-v6.S:124: Error: unrecognized relocation suffix
> 
> The config file indicates:
> 
> CONFIG_CPU_V6=y
> CONFIG_CPU_V7=y
> CONFIG_ARM_LPAE=y
> 
> As V6 CPUs don't support LPAE, this is an invalid configuration, which
> suggests that the constraints within Kconfig are insufficient for LPAE.
> Should ARM_LPAE depend on CPU_V7 && !CPU_32v6 && !CPU_32v5 && !CPU_32v4T
> && !CPU_32v4 && !CPU_32v3 ?

It makes sense. Something like this, unless you've already done it (I
also changed to CPU_32v7 for consistency):


commit d8d34065edfdc1b81f6e3886e15b5c2b2bd30b4e
Author: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Date:   Tue Feb 14 12:12:58 2012 +0000

    ARM: Do not allow ARM_LPAE on pre-ARMv7 architectures
    
    This patch expands the Kconfig dependencies for ARM_LPAE to not allow
    enabling when architectures other than ARMv7 are built into the kernel.
    
    Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
    Reported-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
index 1a3ca24..7edef91 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
@@ -631,7 +631,8 @@ comment "Processor Features"
 
 config ARM_LPAE
 	bool "Support for the Large Physical Address Extension"
-	depends on MMU && CPU_V7
+	depends on MMU && CPU_32v7 && !CPU_32v6 && !CPU_32v5 && \
+		!CPU_32v4 && !CPU_32v3
 	help
 	  Say Y if you have an ARMv7 processor supporting the LPAE page
 	  table format and you would like to access memory beyond the


-- 
Catalin

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [BUG] LPAE can be enabled with non-LPAE capable CPUs
  2012-02-14 12:15 ` Catalin Marinas
@ 2012-02-14 12:20   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2012-02-14 12:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:15:44PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> It makes sense. Something like this, unless you've already done it (I
> also changed to CPU_32v7 for consistency):

Looks good, please put it in the patch system, thanks.

> commit d8d34065edfdc1b81f6e3886e15b5c2b2bd30b4e
> Author: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Date:   Tue Feb 14 12:12:58 2012 +0000
> 
>     ARM: Do not allow ARM_LPAE on pre-ARMv7 architectures
>     
>     This patch expands the Kconfig dependencies for ARM_LPAE to not allow
>     enabling when architectures other than ARMv7 are built into the kernel.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>     Reported-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> index 1a3ca24..7edef91 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -631,7 +631,8 @@ comment "Processor Features"
>  
>  config ARM_LPAE
>  	bool "Support for the Large Physical Address Extension"
> -	depends on MMU && CPU_V7
> +	depends on MMU && CPU_32v7 && !CPU_32v6 && !CPU_32v5 && \
> +		!CPU_32v4 && !CPU_32v3
>  	help
>  	  Say Y if you have an ARMv7 processor supporting the LPAE page
>  	  table format and you would like to access memory beyond the
> 
> 
> -- 
> Catalin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-14 12:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-14  8:21 [BUG] LPAE can be enabled with non-LPAE capable CPUs Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-14 12:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-02-14 12:20   ` Russell King - ARM Linux

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).