From: rabin@rab.in (Rabin Vincent)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: cache-v7: Disable preemption when reading CCSIDR
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:45:24 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120214141524.GB3310@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120213232901.GG25655@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:29:01PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 02:23:29PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 02/13/12 10:15, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:13:27AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >> Thanks. Russell has already merged the original patch to the fixes
> > >> branch. Hopefully he can fold this one in.
> > > Nope, I've asked Linus to pull it.
> > >
> > > So do we conclude that the original patch wasn't properly tested? :P
> >
> > Sigh. Lockdep strikes again! I promise I tested it with lockdep disabled.
> >
> > It looks like Linus' hasn't pulled yet but maybe he just hasn't
> > published it.
>
> It's not nice to change something after you've sent a pull request -
> there's no way of knowing when Linus actually pulls it before he's
> published it, and if he gets something different then it can raise
> questions.
>
> So, it's gone in as-is, and, as I'm now intending asking for another
> pull request soo soon after my previous one, this is something that
> we will have to live with probably for the remainder of the week.
OK, since it can't be folded in, here is a proper patch:
8<---------
>From 26f02624a20a61ed1997a4e8648e4c766a54d91d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:22:07 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: fix v7 boot with lockdep enabled
Bootup with lockdep enabled has been broken on v7 since b46c0f74657d
("ARM: 7321/1: cache-v7: Disable preemption when reading CCSIDR").
This is because v7_setup (which is called very early during boot) calls
v7_flush_dcache_all, and the save_and_disable_irqs added by that patch
ends up attempting to call into lockdep C code (trace_hardirqs_off())
when we are in no position to execute it (no stack, MMU off).
Fix this by using a notrace variant of save_and_disable_irqs. The code
already uses the notrace variant of restore_irqs.
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h | 5 +++++
arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S | 2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
index 62f8095..23371b1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/assembler.h
@@ -137,6 +137,11 @@
disable_irq
.endm
+ .macro save_and_disable_irqs_notrace, oldcpsr
+ mrs \oldcpsr, cpsr
+ disable_irq_notrace
+ .endm
+
/*
* Restore interrupt state previously stored in a register. We don't
* guarantee that this will preserve the flags.
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
index 7a24d396..a655d3d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-v7.S
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ loop1:
cmp r1, #2 @ see what cache we have at this level
blt skip @ skip if no cache, or just i-cache
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT
- save_and_disable_irqs r9 @ make cssr&csidr read atomic
+ save_and_disable_irqs_notrace r9 @ make cssr&csidr read atomic
#endif
mcr p15, 2, r10, c0, c0, 0 @ select current cache level in cssr
isb @ isb to sych the new cssr&csidr
--
1.7.9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-14 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-02 19:24 [PATCH] ARM: cache-v7: Disable preemption when reading CCSIDR Stephen Boyd
2012-02-02 20:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-02 21:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-02-02 23:36 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-02-03 0:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-03 0:49 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-02-03 1:18 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-02-03 2:03 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-02-03 2:35 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-02-03 2:37 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-02-03 3:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-02-03 11:15 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2012-02-04 18:00 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-02-13 17:54 ` Rabin Vincent
2012-02-13 18:09 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-02-13 18:13 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-02-13 18:15 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-13 22:23 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-02-13 23:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-14 14:15 ` Rabin Vincent [this message]
2012-02-14 17:30 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-02-14 18:07 ` Stephen Boyd
2012-02-03 1:16 ` Nicolas Pitre
2012-02-07 3:34 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-02-07 17:42 ` Stephen Boyd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120214141524.GB3310@debian \
--to=rabin@rab.in \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).