From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Query: Multiple Mappings to Mem and ARMV6+
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:29:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120216172928.GD9151@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120216172242.GH27825@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 05:22:42PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 05:15:20PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 04:41:02PM +0000, viresh kumar wrote:
> > > Sorry for starting the long old thread again, but i have to start it as i
> > > was a bit confused. :(
> > >
> > > We know that we can't have multiple mappings with different attributes
> > > to the same physical memory on ARMv6+ machines due to speculative
> > > prefetch.
> > >
> > > So, we have following kind of mappings in kernel now (please correct me
> > > if i am wrong):
> > > - Low Mem: Mapped at boot time to - Normal Cacheable - Bufferable
> > > - ioremap() - blocked on Low Mem, so that we don't create Device type mapping
> > > to same mem
> > > - dma_alloc_coherent() and others:
> > > - Without DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE selected - gives strongly ordered mem
> > > (i.e. Non cacheable - Non Bufferable)
> > > - With DMA_MEM_BUFFERABLE selected - gives Normal - Non cacheable -
> > > Bufferable mapping
> > > - Maybe some other too...
> > >
> > > I have a doubt with the last mapping mentioned above. We have two
> > > mappings possibly to the same physical memory, with different
> > > attributes: One is Cacheable and other one is not.
> > >
> > > Is this allowed by ARM? Because the patch in which Russell blocked
> > > ioremap on Low Mem, he clearly mentioned that these attributes are
> > > also important and they should be same.
> >
> > Section A3.5.7 in the latest ARM ARM (revC) clarifies the mismatched
>
> There's a new version?
Rev C has been available for a while. I thought you got it already:
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.ddi0406c/index.html
It contains the LPAE and virtualisation extensions.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-16 17:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-16 16:41 Query: Multiple Mappings to Mem and ARMV6+ viresh kumar
2012-02-16 17:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-02-16 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-16 17:29 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2012-02-16 17:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-16 17:37 ` viresh kumar
2012-02-16 17:48 ` Catalin Marinas
2012-02-16 18:14 ` viresh kumar
2012-02-20 11:00 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <CAOh2x=nqancNQ1sHpcPFMm+rcPGYEPZ5-YvKeOo6N_TE+fOjTw@mail.gmail.com>
2012-02-20 17:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120216172928.GD9151@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).