linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: ptrace: fix ptrace_read_user for !CONFIG_MMU platforms
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:00:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120221100041.GA19696@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120221083612.GG22562@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:36:12AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 01:24:22AM +0000, Paul Brook wrote:
> > I suspect I submitted the original patch.  I don't remember the details, but 
> > it definitely worked at the time.   IIRC some other targets (m68k?) used an 
> > even less palatable hack.
> 
> I don't believe that - looking at the history in git, since it was merged
> the code has been:
> 
> static int ptrace_read_user(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long off,
>                             unsigned long __user *ret)
> {
>         unsigned long tmp;
> 
>         if (off & 3 || off >= sizeof(struct user))
>                 return -EIO;
> 
>         tmp = 0;
>         if (off == PT_TEXT_ADDR)
>                 tmp = tsk->mm->start_code;
>         else if (off == PT_DATA_ADDR)
>                 tmp = tsk->mm->start_data;
>         else if (off == PT_TEXT_END_ADDR)
>                 tmp = tsk->mm->end_code;
>         else if (off < sizeof(struct pt_regs))
>                 tmp = get_user_reg(tsk, off >> 2);
> 
> And since PT_TEXT_ADDR is 0x10000, this will fail with -EIO.  So, there's
> no way this could have been used successfully in the last 2.5 years.

Agreed, it does seem that this would always have failed, however a quick look
at GDB also suggests that it would at least try to access these guys on an
MMU-less system.

> Maybe no one uses a debugger for uclinux programs?

I confess to finding this by inspection rather than a debugging failure.

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-21 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-20 18:37 [PATCH] ARM: ptrace: fix ptrace_read_user for !CONFIG_MMU platforms Will Deacon
2012-02-20 19:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-21  1:24   ` Paul Brook
2012-02-21  8:36     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-21 10:00       ` Will Deacon [this message]
2012-02-21 10:10         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-21 10:52           ` Will Deacon
2012-02-21 11:35             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-21 13:22               ` Will Deacon
2012-02-24 14:36                 ` Will Deacon
2012-02-24 18:16                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-29 18:52                     ` Will Deacon
2012-03-26 12:43                       ` Will Deacon
2012-02-22  1:33           ` Greg Ungerer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120221100041.GA19696@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).