From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: ptrace: fix ptrace_read_user for !CONFIG_MMU platforms
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 10:52:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120221105250.GC19696@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120221101052.GH22562@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:10:52AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:00:41AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 08:36:12AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > Maybe no one uses a debugger for uclinux programs?
> >
> > I confess to finding this by inspection rather than a debugging failure.
>
> There is another explanation - that is no one in the uclinux world uses
> mainline kernels, and this bug has been fixed ages ago in some uclinux
> kernel tree.
>
> That directly raises the question of the value of having the uclinux
> baggage in the mainline kernel if no one is using mainline kernels for
> uclinux work. If the uclinux folk aren't willing to pass up bug fixes,
> then having it in mainline is, frankly, a waste of space.
I know the validation guys in ARM use mainline kernels for bringup on
MMU-less CPUs (ok, they have extra patches on top but these tend to be
platform-specific hacks since they're running on an RTL emulator. Plus they do
periodically rebase onto new release kernels.). Debugging tends to be at a
much lower level than GDB can provide though (i.e. waveforms), so this would
have gone un-noticed.
I think it's worth keeping the support, particularly in light of the recent
interest in M-class CPUs on the list.
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-21 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-20 18:37 [PATCH] ARM: ptrace: fix ptrace_read_user for !CONFIG_MMU platforms Will Deacon
2012-02-20 19:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-21 1:24 ` Paul Brook
2012-02-21 8:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-21 10:00 ` Will Deacon
2012-02-21 10:10 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-21 10:52 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2012-02-21 11:35 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-21 13:22 ` Will Deacon
2012-02-24 14:36 ` Will Deacon
2012-02-24 18:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-29 18:52 ` Will Deacon
2012-03-26 12:43 ` Will Deacon
2012-02-22 1:33 ` Greg Ungerer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120221105250.GC19696@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).