From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matt@ohporter.com (Matt Porter) Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:11:51 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc-smsc911x: add required smsc911x regulators In-Reply-To: <20120221184648.GR18185@atomide.com> References: <1329151422-2146-1-git-send-email-mporter@ti.com> <20120213165209.GA31482@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120213165617.GE3494@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120213175233.GC1426@atomide.com> <20120213180236.GB31482@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120213181410.GE1426@atomide.com> <20120213185823.GF3494@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120221184648.GR18185@atomide.com> Message-ID: <20120221211151.GA1609@beef> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:46:48AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Mark Brown [120213 10:27]: > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:14:10AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > * Russell King - ARM Linux [120213 09:31]: > > > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 09:52:34AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > > > Can't we just leave out the .id and have it automatically assigned? > > > > It'd be nice but... > > > > > > Unfortunately, there's no such infrastructure in the driver model. > > > > > Hmm OK, -1 seems to be just used for name in platform_device_add(). > > > > -1 is a valid ID also, it means "there's only one of these things so > > don't display a number". Which is sad but there we are. I'm at ELC/ABS > > so I might try and find Greg in person here to see if we can come up > > with something better, it seems like this is something the core ought to > > be able to help with in much the same way that the USB stuff can. > > Matt, care to refresh your original patch using some other number so > we can apply it as a regression fix for the -rc series while the > long term solution is being discussed? > > Just use some random number for now with a comment, 42? Will do, I'll post an update with this approach. -Matt