From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:50:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] regulator: twl6030: add support for vdd1, vdd2 and vdd3 regulators In-Reply-To: <1330094532.4102.555.camel@sokoban> References: <20120223153422.GF4553@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1330076289.4102.517.camel@sokoban> <20120224114940.GB5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1330089398.4102.539.camel@sokoban> <20120224132408.GF5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1330091765.4102.547.camel@sokoban> <20120224140109.GG5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1330093512.4102.552.camel@sokoban> <20120224143415.GL5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <1330094532.4102.555.camel@sokoban> Message-ID: <20120224145027.GN5450@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 04:42:12PM +0200, Tero Kristo wrote: > On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 14:34 +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > Ah, so it is - we're fixing things up in the core. I'd forgotten we did > > that. > So, no need to add list_voltage to this, I just fix the return values > for the get / set and send the new version, am I right? I guess. Though actually given that there's no interaction with the chip itself at all I'm not sure I understand why this is part of the twl6030 driver rather than being a separate driver for whatever implements the operations - it's not like the case with the other regulators where there was some functionality implemented through the twl6030 driver beyond straight passthrough. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: