From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:51:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2] USB: Support for LPC32xx SoC In-Reply-To: <201202241503.27406.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1330030639-3796-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <4F46AA06.30502@antcom.de> <20120224063521.GA16412@pengutronix.de> <201202241503.27406.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <20120225035128.GA4455@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > I would recomment telling this from the device itself rather than from the > platform. Basically yes... > Unfortunately, the way that ohci handles the abstraction between the > various implementations is backwards, it would be much easier if the > main driver was following that model to start with. ... exactly for that reason I didn't suggest it. Looking at other ohci-sources (e.g. ohci-omap.c), machine_is_* seems to be the consistent use-case. Thanks, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: