From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 15:42:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120227154254.GA2440@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZgVSibWugOXcPU7Ai7zjGJMp0BMuKhjs-h0Y=Xee868g@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 04:29:58PM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 11:38:14AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> Maybe I'm delusional but I think this could help centralizing the use
> >> of the SP* cells, since they're obviously used in both SPEAr and
> >> versatile express.
> >
> > They can be used in any PrimeXsys based system, and I don't see that
> > there's anything which guarantees having both a SP810 and SP804
> > together.
> >
> > There are platforms which have SP804 without SP810 - Integrator CP
> > and bcmring seem to fall into that category.
>
> I was more thinking the other way around - I think that all systems
> with an SP810 also have an SP804.
>
> I'm led to thinking this because of these registers:
>
> #define SCCTRL_TIMEREN0SEL_REFCLK (0 << 15)
> #define SCCTRL_TIMEREN0SEL_TIMCLK (1 << 15)
> #define SCCTRL_TIMEREN1SEL_REFCLK (0 << 17)
> #define SCCTRL_TIMEREN1SEL_TIMCLK (1 << 17)
>
> TIMER0 and TIMER1 seems to indicate TIMER0 and TIMER1
> of the SP804 block.
Except... there's four timers, and we may not be necessarily using timer 0
and 1. So, you'd need to know independently which are the two timers
you're using.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-27 15:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-23 9:13 [PATCH] ARM/sp810: introduce API to change system mode Viresh Kumar
2012-02-23 10:03 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-23 10:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-02-27 10:38 ` Linus Walleij
2012-02-27 10:55 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-27 15:29 ` Linus Walleij
2012-02-27 15:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-02-29 20:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-01 3:51 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120227154254.GA2440@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).