From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: at91: Error while registering DMA controller in 3.3-rc
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 11:49:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201203011149.42948.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F4F49E1.4020902@atmel.com>
On Thursday 01 March 2012, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> We currently have a regression on 3.3-rc kernels about the DMA
> controller registration.
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.mmc/13014
>
> This is due to the DMA driver having seen an update during the 3.3 merge
> window but the AT91 device files not having the corresponding
> modifications.
>
> Maybe you remember, those modifications where part of the famous AT91
> board/device series that was postponed to 3.4 due to a flood of issues...
>
> So now, I would like to know if it is possible to resolve this problem
> by queuing the DMA related patches that we have already in
> at91/device-board branch to mainline before 3.3-final?
Yes, that should be possible. We try not have the same patches in multiple
branches, but since this is a regression, I think we should do it anyway.
> The patches that I am talking about are:
>
> bdad0b9 ARM: at91/dma: remove platform data from DMA controller
> and
> 2756bf5 ARM: at91/dma: DMA controller registering with DT support
>
> I do think it is pretty silly to try to resolve this issue by not taking
> those two little patches and modifying source code to workaround this
> issue. If we do this, we will get conflicts and need to rework the
> already queued 3.4 material.
>
> Do you want me to prepare a new at91-fixes branch with those two patches
> or you can take them yourself?
Better send me a pull request so that you can do some testing on the
exact branch that you send me. I would probably end up with the
same tree and I'm not worried about doing it, but we should make sure
that it actually works.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-01 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-01 10:05 at91: Error while registering DMA controller in 3.3-rc Nicolas Ferre
2012-03-01 11:49 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
[not found] ` <4F4F7254.9060306@atmel.com>
2012-03-01 14:03 ` [GIT PULL] at91: fixes for DMA registration (3.3-rc) Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-01 14:06 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201203011149.42948.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).