From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 19:20:25 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: 3ds_debugboard: Let ethernet be functional again In-Reply-To: <20120301105239.GA3124@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1328646473-11828-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com> <20120213082741.GN3852@pengutronix.de> <20120213144820.GA3494@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120214105823.GS3852@pengutronix.de> <20120214172902.GB3916@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120216073236.GE3852@pengutronix.de> <20120216075825.GA11631@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120301100847.GF26642@pengutronix.de> <20120301105239.GA3124@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <20120301182025.GC3852@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 10:52:40AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 11:08:47AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Ok, I tried to do this. I Changed the function to: > > > static struct platform_device *regulator_register_fixed(int id, > > struct regulator_consumer_supply *supplies, int num_supplies) > > > Now I have to register a fixed regulator with some invented value > > for microvolts. What value should I choose? I tried 0 but the core > > won't accept this as explained earlier, in short regulator_register() > > returns with an error. > > I've already suggested just fixing the fixed voltage regulator to be > more sensible when it doesn't have a voltage but you say that won't work > without explaining why you think that is the case and are still ignoring > my repeated queries about that. Maybe because I don't understand what you mean. What should the fixed regulator do when voltage == 0? Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. | | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 | Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |