From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/4] clk: introduce the common clock framework
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 12:52:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120304115201.GB26882@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJOA=zNFNEHxBDhRDdvm7DYR83R0LJjsp_AT3BoG+nL+iN5_tw@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 09:14:43AM -0800, Turquette, Mike wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:29:00AM -0800, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >> The common clock framework defines a common struct clk useful across
> >> most platforms as well as an implementation of the clk api that drivers
> >> can use safely for managing clocks.
> >>
> >> The net result is consolidation of many different struct clk definitions
> >> and platform-specific clock framework implementations.
> >>
> >> This patch introduces the common struct clk, struct clk_ops and an
> >> implementation of the well-known clock api in include/clk/clk.h.
> >> Platforms may define their own hardware-specific clock structure and
> >> their own clock operation callbacks, so long as it wraps an instance of
> >> struct clk_hw.
> >>
> >> See Documentation/clk.txt for more details.
> >>
> >> This patch is based on the work of Jeremy Kerr, which in turn was based
> >> on the work of Ben Herrenschmidt.
> >>
> >> +
> >> +/**
> >> + * struct clk_hw - handle for traversing from a struct clk to its corresponding
> >> + * hardware-specific structure. ?struct clk_hw should be declared within struct
> >> + * clk_foo and then referenced by the struct clk instance that uses struct
> >> + * clk_foo's clk_ops
> >> + *
> >> + * clk: pointer to the struct clk instance that points back to this struct
> >> + * clk_hw instance
> >> + */
> >> +struct clk_hw {
> >> + ? ? struct clk *clk;
> >> +};
> >
> > The reason for doing this is that struct clk should be an opaque cookie
> > for both drivers and implementers of clocks. I recently had the idea whether
> > the roles of these two structs could be swapped. So instead of the above we
> > could do:
> >
> > struct clk {
> > ? ? ? ?struct clk_hw *hw;
> > }
>
> Firstly, struct clk is an opaque cookie for both drivers and
> implementers of clocks with this patchset.
>
> Secondly, struct clk does indeed have a pointer to struct clk_hw.
> Refer to include/linux/clk-private.h in this patch.
>
> The reference is cyclical. A reference to struct clk can navigate to
> struct clk_foo via container_of (usually something like "#define
> to_clk_foo(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct clk_foo, hw)" where struct
> clk's pointer to it's .hw member is passed into one of the struct
> clk_ops callbacks.
>
> Likewise if struct clk_foo needs the struct clk ptr for any reason
> then it can get it from foo->hw->clk.
>
> I believe this patch already does what you suggest, but I might be
> missing your point.
In include/linux/clk-private.h you expose struct clk outside the core.
This has to be done to make static initializers possible. There is a big
warning in this file that it must not be included from files implementing
struct clk_ops. You can simply avoid this warning by declaring struct clk
with only a single member:
include/linux/clk.h:
struct clk {
struct clk_internal *internal;
};
This way everybody knows struct clk (thus can embed it in their static
initializers), but doesn't know anything about the internal members. Now
in drivers/clk/clk.c you declare struct clk_internal exactly like struct
clk was declared before:
struct clk_internal {
const char *name;
const struct clk_ops *ops;
struct clk_hw *hw;
struct clk *parent;
char **parent_names;
struct clk **parents;
u8 num_parents;
unsigned long rate;
unsigned long flags;
unsigned int enable_count;
unsigned int prepare_count;
struct hlist_head children;
struct hlist_node child_node;
unsigned int notifier_count;
#ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG
struct dentry *dentry;
#endif
};
An instance of struct clk_internal will be allocated in
__clk_init/clk_register. Now the private data stays completely inside
the core and noone can abuse it.
With this __clk_init could be something like:
struct clk_initializer {
const char *name;
const struct clk_ops *ops;
char **parent_names;
u8 num_parents;
unsigned long flags;
struct clk *clk;
};
void __clk_init(struct device *dev, struct clk_initializer *init);
I hope I made my intention a bit clearer.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-04 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-03 8:28 [PATCH v5 0/4] common clk framework Mike Turquette
2012-03-03 8:28 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] Documentation: common clk API Mike Turquette
2012-03-03 8:28 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] clk: Kconfig: add entry for HAVE_CLK_PREPARE Mike Turquette
2012-03-05 2:04 ` Richard Zhao
2012-03-05 19:46 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-03 8:29 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] clk: introduce the common clock framework Mike Turquette
2012-03-03 13:31 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-03 17:14 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-04 11:52 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2012-03-05 0:12 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-05 7:38 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-05 20:03 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-06 19:00 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-07 21:20 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-08 6:27 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-08 23:25 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-09 7:57 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-09 18:25 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-19 7:01 ` Shawn Guo
2012-03-19 11:22 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-09 18:18 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-09 0:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-17 3:23 ` Saravana Kannan
2012-03-19 5:38 ` Shawn Guo
2012-03-19 7:42 ` Shawn Guo
2012-03-05 9:22 ` Richard Zhao
2012-03-14 2:03 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-13 11:24 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-13 23:43 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-14 8:48 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-14 20:47 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-14 21:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-14 22:13 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-14 22:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-03-03 8:29 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] clk: basic clock hardware types Mike Turquette
2012-03-04 14:26 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-04 14:35 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-05 0:15 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-04 17:42 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-05 0:30 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-05 8:48 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-05 9:29 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-05 10:17 ` Andrew Lunn
2012-03-09 23:38 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-04 20:33 ` [PATCH] clk: Fix compile errors in DEFINE_CLK_GATE Andrew Lunn
2012-03-05 0:31 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-07 21:20 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] clk: basic clock hardware types Sascha Hauer
2012-03-09 22:50 ` Turquette, Mike
2012-03-09 2:34 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] common clk framework Richard Zhao
2012-03-09 9:19 ` Sascha Hauer
2012-03-09 18:35 ` Turquette, Mike
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120304115201.GB26882@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).