From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] watchdog/coh901327: convert to use watchdog core
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 17:42:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120307164240.GA1130@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1331131929-22383-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com>
Hi Linus,
> -static long coh901327_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
> +static long coh901327_ioctl(struct watchdog_device *wdt_dev, unsigned int cmd,
> unsigned long arg)
> {
> int ret = -ENOTTY;
> u16 val;
> - int time;
> - int new_options;
> union {
> struct watchdog_info __user *ident;
> int __user *i;
> } uarg;
'uarg' is nice name for the union ;) You probably don't need that anymore.
If we keep the ioctl, that is, because...
...
> case WDIOC_GETTIMELEFT:
> clk_enable(clk);
> /* Read repeatedly until the value is stable! */
I was wondering if it pays to put this IOCTL to watchdog_dev and add another
callback to watchdog_ops? I'd think so. Wim, Linus, what do you think? We don't
save much (yet?), but since this is part of the kernel-API it might be nice to
have the common part centralized, even if it is mainly put_user (which might be
nice, too, since most users of GETTIMELEFT cast the result to various types).
> +static struct watchdog_device coh901327_wdt = {
> + .info = &coh901327_ident,
> + .ops = &coh901327_ops,
> + /*
> + * Max margin is 327 since the 10ms
> + * timeout register is max
> + * 0x7FFF = 327670ms ~= 327s.
> + */
I'd drop that comment, but well...
> + .min_timeout = 0,
> + .max_timeout = 327,
Thanks!
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120307/60dc17ea/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-07 16:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-07 14:52 [PATCH] watchdog/coh901327: convert to use watchdog core Linus Walleij
2012-03-07 16:42 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-03-08 6:16 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <20120315212705.GH10698@spo001.leaseweb.com>
2012-03-16 3:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2012-03-16 8:15 ` Linus Walleij
[not found] ` <20120322144950.GU10698@spo001.leaseweb.com>
2012-03-22 18:09 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120307164240.GA1130@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).