From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 18:44:24 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: Add Kconfig option to use mkimage -T
 kernel_noload
In-Reply-To: <4F4EBA8C.1040408@gmail.com>
References: <1330473804-23348-1-git-send-email-swarren@nvidia.com>
 <20120229194409.GO14173@pengutronix.de> <4F4EBA8C.1040408@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <201203121844.24744.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Dear Ryan Mallon,

> On 01/03/12 06:44, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:17:41AM -0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
> >> Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote at Wednesday, February 29, 2012 12:12 PM:
> >>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:33:58AM -0800, Tim Bird wrote:
> >>>> On 02/29/2012 10:14 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> >>>>> On 08:58 Wed 29 Feb     , Stephen Warren wrote:
> >>>>>> Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote at Wednesday, February 29, 2012 
5:30 AM:
> >>>>>>> On 17:03 Tue 28 Feb     , Stephen Warren wrote:
> <snip>
> 
> >> The existing target works just fine today.
> > 
> > It depends what you want to achieve. If you want to make everything
> > maximally easy for everyone you can optimize the uImage target.
> > 
> > If you want to give incentive for U-Boot to improve, drop the target
> > today.
> 
> This assumes that people will upgrade their bootloaders, which is not
> always possible or desirable.
> 
> ~Ryan
> 

Agreed 201%

Best regards,
Marek Vasut