From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sr@denx.de (Stefan Roese)
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 13:33:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH v4] ARM: SPEAr600: Add device-tree support to SPEAr600
 boards
In-Reply-To: <201203161209.18292.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <1331890216-8361-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de>
 <20120316115022.GF7757@game.jcrosoft.org> <201203161209.18292.arnd@arndb.de>
Message-ID: <201203161333.22524.sr@denx.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Friday 16 March 2012 13:09:18 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 16 March 2012, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
> > On 10:30 Fri 16 Mar     , Stefan Roese wrote:
> > > This patch adds a generic target for SPEAr600 board that can be
> > > configured via the device-tree. Currently the following devices
> > > are supported via the devicetree:
> > > 
> > > - VIC interrupts
> > > - PL011 UART
> > > - PL061 GPIO
> > > - Synopsys DW I2C
> > > - Synopsys DW ethernet
> > > 
> > > Other peripheral devices (e.g. SMI flash, FSMC NAND flash etc) will
> > > follow in later patches.
> > 
> > so drop USB, nand & co from the dtsi
> > 
> > this will be add later when the binding will documentated and Acked
> 
> I actually like to see the devices in there, and it already helped
> figure out that there are two buses instead of just one. Maybe we
> can agree on putting them in the file but commenting them out using
> /* */ with an added notice that they will get enabled once we have
> bindings?

It would be great to have a decision on this. I'm leaving for a short vacation 
in a few hours and would like to have the new (hopefully final) patch out 
before that.

Thanks for all your comments,
Stefan