From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:14:25 +0200 Subject: [MX25][MMC] mmc esdhc failure in 3.3 In-Reply-To: <20120327110615.3bfaf969@eb-e6520> References: <5e57eb999780335721212bb8d411406f@mail.fqingenieria.es> <20120312132423.GC2459@pengutronix.de> <9018463dfcd3c9e9a311aeed42b758bf@mail.fqingenieria.es> <0E83723C55F66F43A6041464FE31119D099A34@039-SN2MPN1-011.039d.mgd.msft.net> <85b807b77d73328485781d6fa1568e46@mail.fqingenieria.es> <20120327101259.73525f9d@eb-e6520> <20120327090148.GB6790@pengutronix.de> <20120327110615.3bfaf969@eb-e6520> Message-ID: <20120327091425.GC6790@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org > > Interesting question is now why it worked on your older kernel? The code > > around BROKEN_TIMEOUT is there for much longer, I'd think. > > > not in fact it seems to have been broken from a long time and I think I know and you are saying the same, in fact :) Your patch came in around 2.6.37 and here it was said that 2.6.39 works fine. Might be random, though. > because unlike the i.MX35 it seems that the i.MX25 manages to read > properly the partition table even without the timeout quirk and it > seems that I didn't do more extensive tests for this patch. Please do next time. Regards, Wolfram -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: