linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 1/5] Extcon (external connector): import Android's switch class and modify.
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:19:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120331101953.GA3163@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACSP8SjhOZcXZa2hCNsH8zS+hm8X-i9uNm50UH=_VwOV=BJGmA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:29:27AM -0700, Erik Gilling wrote:

> I'm also not in favor of having functionality conditionally compiled
> based on CONFIG_ANDROID.  If fact, going through the patch stack
> there's much more that changes the ABI from the switch driver than
> just the name.  Android asumes that there is a single "switch" for
> each logical entity (called cable types in extcon) each with a binary
> state (0,1).  Here things have changed to have a single extcon
> instance that can have a bitmask of states which are sent as strings
> in the uevent.

The binary status thing isn't true for the original Android switch API,
at least not in all cases - for headsets it's a tristate indicating if
there's nothing, a headphone or headset plugged in.  This does wind up
being a bitmask because the numbers are 0, 1 and 2 but it isn't really
clear to me if this is intentional or just an effect of counting.

> As it stands, this patch does not solve the cases where we use switch
> today and we'll probably continue to carry the switch driver in the
> common android tree.  If, instead, we got rid of the idea of multiple
> states and mutual exclusivity and relied on the driver that uses
> extcon to have multiple instances for each logical entity and deal
> with mutual exclusion itself, we'd have a driver that would be pretty
> easy to support in android.

What's the advantage in not having information about mutual exclusion in
the core, and why would a userspace that isn't interested in this care?  
It seems like this could be used by userspace to do interesting things,
and I rather suspect you'll find some vendors have added features along
those lines in their Android devices.  For example, having different
configurations for desk docks and car docks even if both end up
connecting the same things up.

Even if the userspace ABI doesn't expose the information it seems
sensible to factor out the code for handling this into the core so
there's less work to do in individual drivers.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120331/426a6350/attachment.sig>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-31 10:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1328856038-21912-1-git-send-email-myungjoo.ham@samsung.com>
2012-02-27 12:15 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] Introduce External Connector Class (extcon) MyungJoo Ham
2012-02-27 12:15   ` [PATCH v6 1/5] Extcon (external connector): import Android's switch class and modify MyungJoo Ham
2012-03-09 12:41     ` Mark Brown
2012-03-12  8:06       ` MyungJoo Ham
2012-03-29 22:27       ` Erik Gilling
2012-03-30  8:56         ` MyungJoo Ham
2012-03-30 10:14           ` Mark Brown
2012-03-30 10:07         ` Mark Brown
2012-03-30 17:29           ` Erik Gilling
2012-03-30 17:38             ` Dima Zavin
2012-04-02  5:09               ` MyungJoo Ham
2012-03-31 10:19             ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-02-27 12:15   ` [PATCH v6 2/5] Extcon: support generic GPIO extcon driver MyungJoo Ham
2012-03-29 22:37     ` Stephen Boyd
2012-03-30  8:33       ` MyungJoo Ham
2012-02-27 12:15   ` [PATCH v6 3/5] Extcon: support notification based on the state changes MyungJoo Ham
2012-02-27 12:15   ` [PATCH v6 4/5] Extcon: support multiple states at a device MyungJoo Ham
2012-02-27 12:15   ` [PATCH v6 5/5] Extcon: support mutually exclusive relation between cables MyungJoo Ham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120331101953.GA3163@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).