From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 14:45:16 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: rename function regulator_register_fixed In-Reply-To: <20120331125440.GA2395@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <1333182812-423-1-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <1333182812-423-2-git-send-email-shawn.guo@linaro.org> <20120331102507.GB3163@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120331125440.GA2395@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: <20120331134515.GB5012@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:54:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 11:25:08AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > There's no harm in using it for regulators that physically exist if > > nothing cares about any of the information it can't provide > I do not think it's practical for physical regulator to use the > function, since the function forces microvolts to be 0. Yeah, but it depends if anyone actually cares what the voltage is - most consumers never look to see what the voltage is because they have no reason to care. The lack of naming is more of an issue really. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: