linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Paul E. McKenney)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH RFC] Simplify the Linux kernel by reducing its state space
Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 09:54:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120331165401.GD2450@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdWTB+_AtqM6JixY=Oo_zmzX_dNxnivpARBYSbPJzp4t6A@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 06:40:30PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 18:33, Paul E. McKenney
> <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Although there have been numerous complaints about the complexity of
> > parallel programming (especially over the past 5-10 years), the plain
> > truth is that the incremental complexity of parallel programming over
> > that of sequential programming is not as large as is commonly believed.
> > Despite that you might have heard, the mind-numbing complexity of modern
> > computer systems is not due so much to there being multiple CPUs, but
> > rather to there being any CPUs at all. ?In short, for the ultimate in
> > computer-system simplicity, the optimal choice is NR_CPUS=0.
> >
> > This commit therefore limits kernel builds to zero CPUs. ?This change
> > has the beneficial side effect of rendering all kernel bugs harmless.
> > Furthermore, this commit enables additional beneficial changes, for
> > example, the removal of those parts of the kernel that are not needed
> > when there are zero CPUs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > ---
> >
> > ?alpha/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? 11 ++++++-----
> > ?arm/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?6 +++---
> > ?blackfin/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?3 ++-
> > ?hexagon/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?9 +++++----
> > ?ia64/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?9 +++++----
> > ?m32r/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 10 ++++++----
> > ?mips/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 21 +++++++++++----------
> > ?mn10300/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?3 ++-
> > ?parisc/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?6 +++---
> > ?powerpc/platforms/Kconfig.cputype | ? ?8 ++++----
> > ?s390/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 12 +++++++-----
> > ?sh/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 11 ++++++-----
> > ?sparc/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?8 ++++----
> > ?tile/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?9 +++++----
> > ?x86/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? 16 +++++++++-------
> > ?15 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
> 
> You forgot to fix half of the architectures, a.o. m68k?

I must confess that I fixed only the SMP-capable architectures.

I of course would welcome additions for UP-only architectures.

							Thanx, Paul

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-31 16:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-31 16:33 [PATCH RFC] Simplify the Linux kernel by reducing its state space Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 16:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2012-03-31 16:54   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
     [not found] ` <CAHrUA35Bz68DtP-Znr=-+U+6P9CONXzN=9JdMXRfRwmVV9fy=Q@mail.gmail.com>
2012-03-31 20:14   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 20:15 ` Linas Vepstas
2012-03-31 20:25   ` Randy Dunlap
2012-03-31 20:43     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 21:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-03-31 21:21   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 22:19     ` Lorenz Kolb
2012-03-31 22:34       ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-03-31 22:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-01  1:22   ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-01 17:34   ` Thomas Gleixner
2012-04-01 18:12     ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-04-01 10:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2012-04-01 18:11   ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120331165401.GD2450@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).