From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 11:41:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120402104142.GB3172@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdbj_shuGWATGER+zxvA9MNDobGjWC3XHh+-5e0R6V4n4w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:33:20AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Yeah ... but this sounds familiar, (searching searching) Yes! We did ask on
> the lists if regulators were proper for modeling power domains in 2008:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=121580531500758&w=2
> But I should've pushed for a proper answer ...
It's not unreasonable to use regulators to model the domains (or as part
of modelling the domains, I'd imagine some systems will be able to do
things to regulators as a result of power domain actions). So long as
the hookup which might affect other systems is done from SoC specific
code and doesn't impact other systems) there shouldn't be an issue from
a framework point of view.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120402/1de9c0c8/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-02 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-01 18:58 [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support Mark Brown
2012-04-01 19:22 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-01 19:39 ` Rabin Vincent
2012-04-01 22:39 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-02 10:14 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-02 10:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-02 11:34 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-02 16:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-02 17:19 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-02 15:52 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-01 21:27 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-01 22:33 ` Linus Walleij
2012-04-02 10:41 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2012-04-06 7:49 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-10 8:31 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-10 8:35 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-10 8:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-10 8:58 ` Shawn Guo
2012-04-06 18:12 ` Rob Herring
2012-04-13 9:03 ` Ulf Hansson
2012-04-13 9:18 ` Mark Brown
2012-04-13 9:54 ` Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120402104142.GB3172@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).