From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 17:57:42 +0100 Subject: [PATCH/RFC v2] ARM: amba: Remove AMBA level regulator support In-Reply-To: <20120402113413.GA7560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1333306720-28344-1-git-send-email-broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120402101427.GA3172@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120402104357.GB24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120402113413.GA7560@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <20120402165742.GD24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 12:34:13PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:43:57AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 11:14:28AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > I was waiting for some pronouncement from Russell - looking at the git > > > logs it seems the patch tracker is the normal way to merge things. > > > Well, this stuff was invented by Linus, so its Linus' decision about > > how to deal with the power control. > > Linus already acked the patch, the question was more about how to get it > merged. Since most of the AMBA changes seem to go via your tree I've > just submitted it to the patch system as 7366/1. Does: ARM PRIMECELL BUS SUPPORT M: Russell King S: Maintained F: drivers/amba/ F: include/linux/amba/bus.h not provide enough clues? Should I delete all my entries in that file because the only people who look in there are spammers when the file is published on the web?