From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marek.vasut@gmail.com (Marek Vasut)
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2012 20:56:04 +0200
Subject: Want to Get Suggestion for MX28 USB Submisson
In-Reply-To: <4F830A4F.4040909@grid-net.com>
References: <35AB98346D25394A9354ED89C4D76587225CFF@039-SN1MPN1-002.039d.mgd.msft.net>
 <201204070334.20650.marek.vasut@gmail.com> <4F830A4F.4040909@grid-net.com>
Message-ID: <201204092056.04269.marek.vasut@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Dear Subodh Nijsure,

> On 04/06/2012 06:34 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Marek Vasut,
> > 
> >> Dear Chen Peter-B29397,
> >> 
> >>>> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Chen Peter-B29397
> >>>> 
> >>>> <B29397@freescale.com>  wrote:
> >>>>> According to sascha's suggestion, it is better to re-submit after we
> >>>> 
> >>>> have
> >>>> 
> >>>>> a generic USB PHY Layer in mainline.
> >>>>> 
> >>>>> Currently, Heikki's split PHY from OTG structure patches have
> >>>>> mainlined, next step is to submit a generic USB PHY driver.
> >>>> 
> >>>> Just for my understanding: is there someone working on this generic
> >>>> USB PHY driver?
> >>> 
> >>> Add related people.
> >>> 
> >>> I have much internal stuff on hands now, and have not bandwidth to do
> >>> it right now.
> >> 
> >> It's in my queue to look into this too, but it's still low prio biz.
> > 
> > Ok, it just became high-prio biz ...
> > 
> > I have the code in prototype phase, will submit it once customer signs
> > the contract (likely next week).
> 
> We have ported USB driver from Freescale's 2.6.35 implementation to
> 3.1-rc5 kernel. We are migrating from 3.1-rc5 to 3.4-rc1 so I am
> starting to look at this. Let me know if I can be of any help. I would
> be more than happy to test stuff you have.

Well, I already have this implemented via the generic phy framework, I don't 
think FSL has this too. I'll be more than happy if you helped testing though ;-)

> -Subodh

Best regards,
Marek Vasut