From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: richard.zhao@freescale.com (Richard Zhao)
Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:17:13 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 01/40] clkdev: add clkname to struct clk_lookup
In-Reply-To: <4F87ED74.8020308@st.com>
References: <20120411084528.GB20818@b20223-02.ap.freescale.net>
 <20120411092034.GV24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <20120411094231.GO3852@pengutronix.de>
 <20120411094704.GY24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <4F879E9D.2090502@st.com>
 <CAAQ0ZWQ-ERDtCgEL9hJysX+-pW-K1O315t9PWoc1RMidLPpppg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F87B443.6090405@st.com>
 <CAAQ0ZWR3-TvFjV3CX5oW+bUN6aW7ip5NphuKycq3twks2RrpMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120413085901.GG3168@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <4F87ED74.8020308@st.com>
Message-ID: <20120413091712.GE27730@b20223-02.ap.freescale.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 02:40:12PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 4/13/2012 2:29 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Or we need to dump the arguments into a struct.
> 
> Then we would end up creating too many structures in our mach/clock.c
> files. That will look bad. May perform better. :)
or pass struct clk_lookup* ? For non-leaf clks, it's NULL.

> 
> -- 
> viresh
>