From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sameo@linux.intel.com (Samuel Ortiz) Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 17:32:24 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 1/2] mfd: add irq domain support for max8997 interrupts In-Reply-To: <20120404212257.GE10787@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <1332582590-16382-1-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <1332582590-16382-2-git-send-email-thomas.abraham@linaro.org> <20120404212257.GE10787@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Message-ID: <20120416153224.GF24130@sortiz-mobl> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Mark, On Wed, Apr 04, 2012 at 10:22:57PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 03:19:49PM +0530, Thomas Abraham wrote: > > Add irq domain support for max8997 interrupts. The reverse mapping method > > used is linear mapping since the sub-drivers of max8997 such as regulator > > and charger drivers can use the max8997 irq_domain to get the linux irq > > number for max8997 interrupts. All uses of irq_base in platform data and > > max8997 driver private data are removed. > > > Cc: MyungJoo Ham > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham > > Acked-by: Grant Likely > > CCing in Samuel for the MFD review - review tends to be faster if you CC > maintainers! Samuel, there's a followup patch for the regulator API > which is likely to collide with some API updates so is it OK to merge > via regulator if the patch is OK? Yes, the patch looks fine, you can merge it through the regulator tree with my Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz if you think that's necessary. Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/