From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] OMAP2+: UART: Add mechanism to probe uart pins and configure rx wakeup
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:41:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120417014103.GA21106@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMrsUdK2ZqCGWtL104tBC_h-XHD0UMMFagch_eSER+92zC1FiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Few more comments below.
* Raja, Govindraj <govindraj.raja@ti.com> [120411 04:53]:
...
> +static int __init omap_serial_fill_default_pads(struct omap_board_data *bdata,
> + struct omap_uart_state *uart)
> +{
> + struct omap_mux_partition *tx_partition = NULL, *rx_partition = NULL;
> + struct omap_mux *rx_mux = NULL, *tx_mux = NULL;
> + char *rx_fmt, *tx_fmt;
> + int uart_nr = bdata->id + 1;
> +
> + if (bdata->id != 2) {
> + rx_fmt = "uart%d_rx.uart%d_rx";
> + tx_fmt = "uart%d_tx.uart%d_tx";
> + } else {
> + rx_fmt = "uart%d_rx_irrx.uart%d_rx_irrx";
> + tx_fmt = "uart%d_tx_irtx.uart%d_tx_irtx";
> + }
> +
> + snprintf(rx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN, rx_fmt,
> + uart_nr, uart_nr);
> + snprintf(tx_pad_name, OMAP_UART_DEFAULT_PAD_NAME_LEN, tx_fmt,
> + uart_nr, uart_nr);
This naming won't work for the fourth port on 3630 as there are no "uart4_rx"
or "uart4_tx" mux entries, they are "gpmc_wait2.uart4_tx" and
"gpmc_wait3.uart4_tx".
> @@ -289,8 +354,8 @@ void __init omap_serial_board_init(struct
> omap_uart_port_info *info)
> bdata.pads = NULL;
> bdata.pads_cnt = 0;
>
> - if (cpu_is_omap44xx() || cpu_is_omap34xx())
> - omap_serial_fill_default_pads(&bdata);
> + if (omap_serial_fill_default_pads(&bdata, uart))
> + continue;
>
> if (!info)
> omap_serial_init_port(&bdata, NULL);
Can't the omap_serial_board_init() now be just be omap_serial_init(void)
as it's not used anywhere else?
Anyways, this is getting too complex for the -rc series as at least 2430sdp
is using alternative pins for the first uart. Let's patch to remove just
the uart4 entry for 3630 for the -rc and then we can properly fix this
for the next merge window.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-17 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-10 13:40 [PATCH 0/2] OMAP2+: UART: Fix usage of default mux pads Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 13:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] OMAP2+: UART: Fix incorrect population of default uart pads Govindraj.R
2012-04-11 20:14 ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:14 ` Russ Dill
2012-04-17 17:50 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-23 23:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-24 8:38 ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-05-04 17:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-05-07 17:39 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-05-07 17:54 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-10 13:40 ` [PATCH 2/2] OMAP2+: UART: Add mechanism to probe uart pins and configure rx wakeup Govindraj.R
2012-04-10 16:11 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-04-10 16:40 ` Russ Dill
2012-04-11 11:50 ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-11 20:16 ` Russ Dill
2012-04-13 23:39 ` Russ Dill
2012-04-17 1:41 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-04-17 12:47 ` Raja, Govindraj
2012-04-17 17:47 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120417014103.GA21106@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).