From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com (Mark Brown) Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 17:56:50 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] Second patchset for LPC32xx device tree conversion In-Reply-To: <201204181100.40123.arnd@arndb.de> References: <1334682507-15055-1-git-send-email-stigge@antcom.de> <201204180806.16848.arnd@arndb.de> <20120418093604.GL6498@mwanda> <201204181100.40123.arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <20120418165650.GD3099@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:00:39AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > 1. develop on -rc > 2. merge with latest -next, test and make sure it works there > 3. submit for review against -rc > 4. have patches included in -next once reviewed, but based on -rc > 5. when merge window opens, have patches sent for upstream inclusion Steps 3 and 4 should be to submit against whatever branch is appropriate for the subsystem and driver - if people follow this process they're going to get bounced back by a fair proportion of maintainers, -rc isn't universally what people are looking for so people should be aware that they need to pay attention here. Generally I'd say the development version is a safer bet than -rc for most subsystems. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: