From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv8 05/10] I2C: OMAP: Don't check if wait_for_completion_timeout() returns less than zero
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 19:11:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120423171108.GJ27321@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1334842101-20670-6-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 06:58:16PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> By definition, wait_for_completion_timeout() returns an unsigned value and
> therefore, it is not necessary to check if the return value is less than zero
> as this is not possible.
>
> This is based on a patch from Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
> Changes from his patch
> - Declare a long as the wait_for_completion_timeout returns long.
>
> Original patch is
> http://git.omapzoom.org/?p=kernel/omap.git;a=commitdiff;h=ea02cece7b0000bc736e60c4188a11aaa74bc6e6
The original patch has a signed-off, so you need to include it here as
well.
>
> Cc : Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 10 ++++------
> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> index 1777d79..fec8d5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> @@ -473,7 +473,7 @@ static int omap_i2c_xfer_msg(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> struct i2c_msg *msg, int stop)
> {
> struct omap_i2c_dev *dev = i2c_get_adapdata(adap);
> - int r;
> + unsigned long timeout;
> u16 w;
>
> dev_dbg(dev->dev, "addr: 0x%04x, len: %d, flags: 0x%x, stop: %d\n",
> @@ -541,12 +541,10 @@ static int omap_i2c_xfer_msg(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
> * REVISIT: We should abort the transfer on signals, but the bus goes
> * into arbitration and we're currently unable to recover from it.
> */
> - r = wait_for_completion_timeout(&dev->cmd_complete,
> - OMAP_I2C_TIMEOUT);
> + timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&dev->cmd_complete,
> + OMAP_I2C_TIMEOUT);
> dev->buf_len = 0;
> - if (r < 0)
> - return r;
> - if (r == 0) {
> + if (timeout == 0) {
> dev_err(dev->dev, "controller timed out\n");
> omap_i2c_init(dev);
> return -ETIMEDOUT;
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120423/08dc2423/attachment-0001.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-23 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-19 13:28 [PATCHv8 00/10] I2C fixes Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-19 13:28 ` [PATCHv8 01/10] I2C: OMAP: make omap_i2c_unidle/idle functions depend on CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-19 13:28 ` [PATCHv8 02/10] I2C: OMAP: Fix the mismatch of pm_runtime enable and disable Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-23 15:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-23 15:57 ` Datta, Shubhrajyoti
2012-04-19 13:28 ` [PATCHv8 03/10] I2C: OMAP: Fix the interrupt clearing in OMAP4 Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-19 13:28 ` [PATCHv8 04/10] I2C: OMAP: Fix the error handling Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-23 17:10 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-19 13:28 ` [PATCHv8 05/10] I2C: OMAP: Don't check if wait_for_completion_timeout() returns less than zero Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-23 17:11 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-04-19 13:28 ` [PATCHv8 06/10] I2C: OMAP: Fix the crash in i2c remove Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-23 16:49 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-24 18:14 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-04-24 18:18 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-26 6:28 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-04-26 6:43 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-04-19 13:28 ` [PATCHv8 07/10] I2C: OMAP: Handle error check for pm runtime Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-23 16:20 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-23 17:26 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-04-19 13:28 ` [PATCHv8 08/10] I2C: OMAP: fix missing handling of errata I2C_OMAP3_1P153 Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-23 16:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-23 17:35 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-04-19 13:28 ` [PATCHv8 09/10] I2C: OMAP: Do not set the XUDF if the underflow is not reached Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-23 16:42 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-23 17:29 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-04-19 13:28 ` [PATCHv8 10/10] I2C: OMAP: Rename the 1p153 to the erratum id i462 Shubhrajyoti D
2012-04-23 17:05 ` [PATCHv8 00/10] I2C fixes Wolfram Sang
2012-04-23 17:41 ` Shubhrajyoti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120423171108.GJ27321@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).