From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:08:41 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: imx6q: switch to use pinctrl driver In-Reply-To: References: <1334933916-12971-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <1334933916-12971-3-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> Message-ID: <20120424090841.GA6987@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:56:43AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Dong Aisheng wrote: > > > From: Dong Aisheng > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > > > --- > > This is not a formal patch and is only used for test > > since before the pinctrl core handle dummy state is in, > > enable pinctrl in driver will break other platforms. > > > > ChangeLog v1->v2: > > * using updated binding > > --- > > ?arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-arm2.dts ? | ? ?2 ++ > > ?arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi ? ? ? | ? 17 +++++++++++++++++ > > ?arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?2 ++ > > ?drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | ? 12 ++++++++++++ > > ?4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Since this touches the MMC driver I'd like an ACK from the > maintainer, but no maintainer is set for this subdriver, still > it feels like Sascha and/or Wolfram should be involved. Can we have a more descriptive name for the pinctrl member? -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ | -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: