From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: aisheng.dong@freescale.com (Dong Aisheng) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 17:15:04 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: imx6q: switch to use pinctrl driver In-Reply-To: References: <1334933916-12971-1-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> <1334933916-12971-3-git-send-email-b29396@freescale.com> Message-ID: <20120424091504.GC32166@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Linus, On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:56:43AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Dong Aisheng wrote: > > > From: Dong Aisheng > > > > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng > > > > --- > > This is not a formal patch and is only used for test > > since before the pinctrl core handle dummy state is in, > > enable pinctrl in driver will break other platforms. > > > > ChangeLog v1->v2: > > * using updated binding > > --- > > ?arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q-arm2.dts ? | ? ?2 ++ > > ?arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi ? ? ? | ? 17 +++++++++++++++++ > > ?arch/arm/mach-imx/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?2 ++ > > ?drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-esdhc-imx.c | ? 12 ++++++++++++ > > ?4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > Since this touches the MMC driver I'd like an ACK from the > maintainer, but no maintainer is set for this subdriver, still > it feels like Sascha and/or Wolfram should be involved. > This is for test. Before the pinctrl dummy state patch got in first, we can not get it in since it will break other platforms not support pinctrl to use this driver. I will send a formal patch after dummy state patch is in. Thanks for the review. Regards Dong Aisheng