From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 20:51:27 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: imx: Add common imx cpuidle init functionality. In-Reply-To: References: <20120423062739.GX3852@pengutronix.de> <20120423065259.GR26306@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120423065623.GA3852@pengutronix.de> <20120423071013.GS26306@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120423074856.GU20478@pengutronix.de> <20120424013841.GB26306@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120424075426.GP24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120424083603.GE26306@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: <20120424195127.GA3628@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:40:35AM -0500, Rob Lee wrote: > Thanks for the attention on this. From what I've understood, I will > send another submission that includes the imx cpuidle patchset and > Shawn's device tree late initcall patchset and I'll provide > explanation of the two separate patchsets in the cover sheet. What I also want to see _along with_ the addition of the init_late callback is a patch set from the _same_ people fixing up the rest of arch/arm/mach-* to use it - you know, like what I do when I introduce these kinds of things. Otherwise I'm going to NAK the change. We can't have new stuff introduced in this way and the older platforms ignored. Forward progress across the board please.