From: w.sang@pengutronix.de (Wolfram Sang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] I2C: Implement DMA support into mxs-i2c
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 21:52:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120430195221.GB28226@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201204301410.14393.marex@denx.de>
> > > static int mxs_i2c_finish_read(struct mxs_i2c_dev *i2c, u8 *buf, int
> > > len) {
> > >
> > > - u32 data;
> > > + u32 data = 0;
> >
> > Unrelated, useless change.
>
> Have you tried compiling the code with gcc 4.7?
What has the compiler version to do with the relevance? :) This has
nothing to do with adding DMA support. Plus, nobody so far could tell me
what path gcc is seeing there.
> > > + i2c->dma_mode = 1;
> >
> > Have you measured the overhead of DMA? I'd still think that
> >
> > if (MX23 || msg->len > 24)
> > do_dma
> > else
> > do_pioqueue
> >
> > might be worth considered.
>
> It might, but in the 2.6.35.3 I have from FSL, it only does:
>
> WARN_ONCE(len > 24, "choose DMA mode if xfer len > 24 bytes\n");
Well, we are back to the "FSL code is just a reference" topic. I truly
hope that part was implemented because of laziness and not because of
hardware limitations.
> Also, I tried switching PIOQUEUE/DMA, but didn't get it working. We might as
> well make this dma/pioqueue mode configurable as well as speed via platform data
> until someone comes up with a patch that can mix pioqueue and dma?
User configuration is not an option here IMO, because PIOQUEUE would still
fail for bigger transfers. "Always DMA" might be better then. But I will
try to switch modes this week, that's just too tempting.
Regards,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120430/b81d51a3/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-30 19:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-29 22:36 [PATCH 1/2] I2C: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c Marek Vasut
2012-04-29 22:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] I2C: Implement DMA support into mxs-i2c Marek Vasut
2012-04-30 6:05 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-30 12:10 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-30 19:52 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2012-04-30 20:07 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-30 20:30 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-30 20:45 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-30 21:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-30 21:19 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-01 13:58 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-01 14:02 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-01 14:09 ` Shawn Guo
2012-05-01 14:14 ` Marek Vasut
2012-05-01 14:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-04-30 5:58 ` [PATCH 1/2] I2C: Set I2C timing registers for mxs-i2c Wolfram Sang
2012-04-30 12:05 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-30 19:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-30 20:09 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-30 20:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2012-04-30 20:47 ` Marek Vasut
2012-04-30 21:02 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120430195221.GB28226@pengutronix.de \
--to=w.sang@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).