From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: marex@denx.de (Marek Vasut)
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 16:14:01 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] I2C: Implement DMA support into mxs-i2c
In-Reply-To: <20120501140910.GM2194@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
References: <1335738969-27445-1-git-send-email-marex@denx.de>
 <201205011602.56563.marex@denx.de>
 <20120501140910.GM2194@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Message-ID: <201205011614.02140.marex@denx.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Dear Shawn Guo,

> On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 04:02:56PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > Dear Shawn Guo,
> > 
> > > On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 11:01:08PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > > > > It complains that data might be undefined, do you want it in a
> > > > > > > separate patch then ?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yes, but only if you can prove that the compiler is right.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It's not right, because that variable is always initialized, but
> > > > > this at least squashes the compile warning.
> > > > 
> > > > The compiler needs to be fixed, not the kernel.
> > 
> > I second this.
> 
> I agree on this too.
> 
> > > Heh, this is coming up again.  I'm not convincing you to take the
> > > change, but just curious what if this is not a compile warning but
> > > an error for the same cause that compiler is not right.
> > 
> > Can you elaborate?
> 
> Will we have the kernel not compilable for a few cycles until the
> compiler fixing is available, or we work it around to keep kernel
> compiling and working before we have the compiler fixed?

This is kind of lacmus paper showing if the compiler was fixed. On the other 
hand, many people won't have a fixed compiler for a long time, so I'd be for 
applying this patch.

Best regards,
Marek Vasut