From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux) Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 15:13:34 +0100 Subject: [PATCH V3 1/8] CLKDEV: Add helper routines to allocate and add clkdevs for given struct clk * In-Reply-To: <20120502135945.GD2194@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> References: <0fb69ddb87f9a5e6a6afec2f833c6341e45763c7.1335249846.git.viresh.kumar@st.com> <20120426074746.GD24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4F992369.2020308@st.com> <20120428095222.GP24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120428110108.GD20478@pengutronix.de> <20120428110635.GQ24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120501123149.GE2194@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> <20120502095404.GA24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120502135945.GD2194@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net> Message-ID: <20120502141334.GD3548@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 09:59:48PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 10:54:04AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 08:31:51PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote: > > > > + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { > > > > > > With above line changed to: > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < num; i++, cl++) { > > > > > > > > > Tested-by: Shawn Guo > > > > Thanks, fixed that and committed. > > Can you please publish a branch for clkdev patches, so that we can ask > Arnd to pull it into arm-soc as a dependency of platform clock porting? Let's wait for it to be in linux-next - and having it go through one of my nightly build cycles first (which is where the problem with the last version from Viresh was noticed.)