From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mturquette@ti.com (Mike Turquette) Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 15:41:08 -0700 Subject: [PATCH V3 2/8] clk: add a fixed factor clock In-Reply-To: <4FA120E8.5030707@st.com> References: <20120502094807.GE20478@pengutronix.de> <4FA120E8.5030707@st.com> Message-ID: <20120502224108.GC18402@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 20120502-17:26, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 5/2/2012 3:18 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > This needs a fixup. The clock framework used to pass in a NULL pointer > > as prate when a clk is not allowed to change a parents clock. This > > is no longer true, so we have to check for > > > > __clk_get_flags(hw->clk) & CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT > > Sure. Will send fixup. > > @Mike: When will you send your clk patches to Arnd? > I am asking this, because SPEAr patches are dependent on > them. Also, please include this patch too, in your patchset. > > I will send a fixup. I will take this patch in before sending my request to Arnd. In your patch 0/8 you ask me to take in the series, but it looks like not all of the patches are going through me. For instance patch 2/8 certainly looks destined for Russell. After fixing up this patch can you resend a clean series which is only headed for clk-next? Thanks, Mike