From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
Date: Thu, 3 May 2012 17:45:01 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 6.2/7] MMC: mmci: Enable Device Tree support for ux500
In-Reply-To: <4FA2B4A3.2040402@linaro.org>
References: <1334325909-5779-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <1334325909-5779-7-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <CACRpkdYyP=V=aXtDuo_W4oDxH0UkQKq1x1HKG_z=zWHoWng6JQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F8BE5B0.4000900@linaro.org> <20120425185747.GC24211@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <4FA29E46.6040204@linaro.org> <20120503151253.GE897@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <4FA2A4A8.9010208@linaro.org> <20120503163008.GF897@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <4FA2B4A3.2040402@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <20120503164501.GG897@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 05:38:59PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Would you be kind enough to cast your eye over the documentation patch  
> as well please? I believe Chris is waiting on an Ack from you before he  
> will pull it.
>
> [PATCH 7/7] MMC: mmci: Add required documentation for Device Tree bindings

I'm not sure I'm the right person for doing that because I've hardly
touched DT stuff.

Provided the properties are sanely named, and the common properties between
drivers is already sensibly separated, then I don't see there's much to
comment on.

One thing that might help is if the format of these descriptions were
changed so that there was one file per subsystem documenting the common
options, rather than (eg) every MMC driver documentating the same base
options time and time again.