linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] Remove support for ARMv3 ARM610 and ARM710 CPUs
Date: Fri, 4 May 2012 16:02:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120504150253.GH26481@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120504144643.GG26481@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 03:46:43PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 02:41:24PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 04 May 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > This patch removes support for ARMv3 CPUs, which haven't worked properly
> > > for quite some time (see the FIXME comment in arch/arm/mm/fault.c).  The
> > > only V3 parts left is the cache model for ARMv3, which is needed for some
> > > odd reason by ARM740T CPUs, and being able to build with -march=armv3,
> > > which is required for the RiscPC platform due to its bus structure.
> > 
> > No objections to the patch, but I wonder if this change obsoletes any
> > hardware drivers in turn.  Are there any RiscPC peripherals that are
> > only available on the older models?
> 
> "older models" ?  It's not a machine where the CPU is soldered to the
> motherboard.  I could describe it as being like an x86 motherboard where
> you can plug either an ARM610, ARM710 or StrongARM CPU into it.  The
> CPU type is merely incidental.

I'll point out that we can remove drivers if we kill off ARMv4 support,
which would mean getting rid of all the StrongARM and FA526 CPU support.
That would also mean removing all of ebsa110, footbridge, riscpc, gemini,
sa1100, and shark mach- subdirectories.

It also means I would no longer be able to test various chunks of code
which I currently look after, such as ARM PCI stuff, PCMCIA soc-common,
and some DMA engine stuff.

What I'm basically pointing out is that the majority of my infrastructure
here runs on ARMv4 StrongARM based platforms, and I don't see this
changing any time soon.  As long as that is the case, I have a vested
and selfish interest in keeping the kernel buildable for ARMv4.

  reply	other threads:[~2012-05-04 15:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-05-04  9:56 [RFC] Remove support for ARMv3 ARM610 and ARM710 CPUs Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-04 11:16 ` Will Deacon
2012-05-04 14:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 14:46   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-04 15:02     ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-05-04 15:33       ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 15:38         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-05-04 15:20     ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-05-04 15:39 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120504150253.GH26481@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).